|
1998 Summary
The Chancellor’s Senior
Survey on the Undergraduate Experience at UIUC
by
John C. Ory
For a printed, bound
copy of this report, please contact the
Center for Teaching Excellence, 249 Armory Bldg.
In 1989, a task force appointed by the
Chancellor created a questionnaire to be administered to all graduating seniors
at UIUC. The results of the survey, the Chancellor said, "will be useful in
responding to requests for information on how our students feel about the
educational experience they have had as undergraduates here and in identifying
problems on campus which need our attention." The survey was administered each
year from 1990 to 1993. Due to the consistency of results the survey was not
administered again until 1996.
The 1996 survey was modified to include a
section of items asking students to assess their entering and exiting abilities.
Due to the usefulness of this new section for campus initiatives involved in the
assessment of student outcomes, the campus decided to restart annual
administrations of the survey.
For the first time the Senior Survey was
administered electronically in 1998. In March 1998 an e-mail message regarding
the Senior Survey was sent to all seniors on the May graduation list. The e-mail
message from the Chancellor asked students to complete the survey posted on a
university Web-site. Ten days following the initial e-mail message a follow-up
message was sent reminding students to complete the survey. Survey respondents
were entered into a lottery with a single prize of two free airline tickets
valued at $500 each. Of these 4,200 seniors, 1,683, or approximately 40%,
responded. Similar to past years, the respondents were roughly representative of
the graduating class by gender, ethnic origin, and academic affiliation as
indicated below.
Percentage of Respondents All
Seniors
| Gender |
|
|
| Male |
48.2 |
48.6 |
| Female |
51.8 |
48.1 |
| Ethnic Origin |
|
|
| Caucasian |
78.0 |
75.9 |
| Hispanic/Latino |
3.3 |
4.4 |
| African-American |
4.0 |
5.3 |
| Asian-American |
13.6 |
12.5 |
| Native American |
.0 |
0.3 |
| Unknown 1 |
1.1 |
1.8 |
| College of Graduation |
|
|
| ACES |
7.0 |
7.4 |
| Applied Life Studies |
3.4 |
4.0 |
| CBA |
19.1 |
15.1 |
| Communications |
2.9 |
3.4 |
| Education |
1.8 |
3.3 |
| Engineering |
20.1 |
15.6 |
| Fine & Applied Arts |
5.8 |
7.8 |
| Liberal Arts & Sciences |
35.8 |
41.5 |
Care should be taken in interpreting the results
of the survey because the small number of respondents in some sub-categories
makes the results statistically unreliable. This summary presents highlights of
the data following the general order of the survey, a copy of which is attached
to this report. A "Comparison to Previous Years" section at the end of the
summary presents yearly comparisons of survey results.
Demographics
Survey respondents present a picture of a very
traditional student body, with large majorities enrolling as freshmen and
completing a bachelor’s degree in eight semesters at age 21 or 22. The
respondents were 79% Caucasian and
92% Illinois residents. Approximately 4% more
females than males responded to the survey.
Academically, 70% of the respondents
self-assessed their grade-point average as between 2.75 and 3.75. Approximately
50% of the students never changed their major, while another 38% changed majors
once. Approximately 40% of the respondents reported working each semester
part-time while another 40% reported working "occasionally" part-time.
Approximately 70% of the respondents worked during the summer.
First enrolled at UIUC as:

Number of times you changed major while at
UIUC:

Did you change your career choice?

Did you participate in volunteer or community
service work?

Did you seek personal counseling?

Do you have a disability?

Number of semesters it took to complete your
degree:

Current age:

Gender:

Ethnic origin:

Approximate GPA:

Citizenship:

Employment while undergraduate*:

*
Totals more than 100% because some students worked both summers and part- or
full-time during school year.
Satisfaction with broad aspects of the
undergraduate experience
The survey asked about senior satisfaction in
three broad categories, and then, in a brief fourth section, about the overall
experience at UIUC. Students were asked to choose from a five-point Likert
scale, ranging from one for lowest satisfaction to five for highest
satisfaction. The broad categories were:
• Teaching and educational environment
included 18 questions on the quality of teaching and facilities, access to
courses and faculty, class size, and teachers’ evaluation of students.
• Campus environment included 13
questions on racism, sexism, welcome, help, and atmosphere.
• Self-assessment of entering and
exiting abilities required students to assess their entering and
exiting competency levels in 20 abilities, including writing, speaking,
organizing time, and using technology.
• Overall undergraduate experience
included four questions: satisfaction with the overall educational
experience at UIUC, current attitude toward UIUC, attitude toward the
respondent’s major, and what the respondent would do given the chance to
start all over again.
The categories were an organizational device,
making it inadvisable to seek generalizations, such as "students were satisfied
overall
with the campus environment." Instead, the summary will attempt to point out
noteworthy responses to individual questions. Before going into the categories
individually, a
graphic overview of the average ratings for all
teaching, educational, and campus items is presented below.
Teaching and educational environment
Mean Frequency %
Low
High
| |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
| 1. Quality of teaching
by faculty in your major |
3.9 |
2 |
6 |
18 |
48 |
27 |
| 2. Quality of teaching
by faculty outside your major |
3.5 |
1 |
7 |
38 |
47 |
8 |
| 3. Quality of teaching
by TAs |
3.3 |
3 |
13 |
41 |
37 |
6 |
| 4. Quality of
laboratories and classrooms |
3.5 |
2 |
10 |
37 |
40 |
11 |
| 5. Quality of academic
program advising and information |
3.0 |
14 |
23 |
27 |
26 |
12 |
| 6. Quality of career
advising and information |
3.0 |
13 |
20 |
29 |
27 |
11 |
| 7. Access to courses
and course sections in major |
4.0 |
2 |
7 |
17 |
40 |
34 |
| 8. Access to elective
courses and course sections |
3.5 |
4 |
13 |
30 |
37 |
16 |
| 9. Process of student
evaluation of teaching |
3.1 |
8 |
18 |
34 |
31 |
9 |
| 10. Class size at the
100 and 200 course level |
3.1 |
7 |
19 |
36 |
30 |
8 |
| 11. Class size at the
300 course level |
4.1 |
2 |
4 |
13 |
42 |
40 |
| 12. Overall
educational philosophy of your major |
3.8 |
3 |
8 |
21 |
44 |
23 |
| 13. Fairness of
student performance evaluation procedures |
3.7 |
1 |
6 |
26 |
53 |
13 |
| 14. Usefulness of student evaluation
procedures in assisting students to learn |
3.3 |
3 |
15 |
38 |
39 |
6 |
| 15. Quantity of
faculty office hours |
3.7 |
2 |
10 |
29 |
41 |
18 |
| 16. Faculty members’
presence during posted office hours |
4.0 |
1 |
5 |
21 |
42 |
31 |
| 17. Accessibility of
faculty in general |
3.8 |
1 |
8 |
25 |
43 |
23 |
| 18. Communication
between faculty and students regarding student needs and concerns |
3.4 |
4 |
13 |
33 |
36 |
14 |
For all respondents, the items with the highest
satisfaction ratings in this section were:
4.1: Class size at the 300 course
level.
4.0: Access to courses and course
sections in major.
4.0: Faculty members’ presence during
posted office hours.
3.9: Quality of teaching by faculty in
your major.
For all respondents, the items with the lowest
satisfaction ratings in this section were:
3.0: Quality of academic program
advising and information.
3.0: Quality of career advising and
information.
3.1: Class size at the 100 and 200
course level.
3.1: Process of student evaluation of
teaching.
Campus environment
Mean Frequency %
Low
High
| 19. It was easy to
meet and get to know other students |
3.7 |
3 |
11 |
23 |
36 |
27 |
| 20. It was easy to get
involved in student groups and activities |
4.0 |
1 |
7 |
21 |
36 |
35 |
| 21. There was exposure
to different student backgrounds and cultures |
3.9 |
2 |
9 |
19 |
35 |
35 |
| 22a. The classroom
environment was free from racist behavior |
4.1 |
2 |
6 |
16 |
34 |
41 |
| 22b. The classroom
environment was free from sexist behavior |
3.9 |
3 |
8 |
20 |
35 |
34 |
| 23a. The campus
environment was free from racism |
3.0 |
11 |
22 |
30 |
26 |
11 |
| 23b. The campus
environment was free from sexism |
3.4 |
6 |
16 |
31 |
32 |
16 |
| 24a. The University
appropriately addressed problems of racism |
3.3 |
11 |
14 |
29 |
28 |
19 |
| 24b. The University
appropriately addressed problems of sexism |
3.5 |
6 |
10 |
31 |
32 |
22 |
| 25. You felt you were
welcome at UIUC |
4.1 |
2 |
5 |
17 |
38 |
38 |
| 26. You had someone
(University employee) that you could go to for help |
3.4 |
13 |
14 |
23 |
25 |
26 |
| 27. The "University"
cared about you |
2.6 |
21 |
24 |
33 |
17 |
6 |
| 28. You felt safe on
campus |
3.6 |
3 |
10 |
26 |
42 |
19 |
For all respondents, the items with the highest
satisfaction ratings in this section were:
4.1: The classroom environment
was free from racist behavior.
4.1: You felt that you were welcome at
UIUC.
4.0: It was easy to get involved in
student groups and activities.
3.9: The classroom environment
was free from sexist behavior.
3.9: There was exposure to different
student backgrounds and cultures.
For all respondents, the items with the lowest
satisfaction ratings in this section were:
2.6: The "University" cared about
you.
3.0: The campus environment
was free from racism.
There was a noticeable difference between the
ratings on the items asking if the classroom was free from racist behavior (4.1)
and if the campus was free from racism (3.0). The graphs below show some of the
variation by ethnic background on these questions. (Please note, as previously
indicated, that survey respondents underrepresented African-American and
Hispanic/Latino respondents. The number of respondents by ethnic origin is 1,313
Caucasian, 229 Asian-American, 67 African-American, 57 Hispanic/Latino, and one
Native American.)
22a. The classroom environment was
free from racist behavior.

**No average provided due to having only one
respondent.
23a. The campus environment was free
from racism.

24a. The University appropriately addressed
problems of racism.

Men and women disagreed about the extent of
sexism on campus and the university’s attempt to address the problem.
22b. The classroom environment was
free from sexist behavior.

23b. The campus environment was free
from sexism.

24b. The University appropriately addressed
problems of sexism.

Comparison of Entering and Exiting Abilities
The
respondents reported increases in their entering competency levels for all but
one ("Communicate in a language other than English") of the abilities listed.
The abilities with the greatest difference between entering and exiting
competency levels were:
+1.6 Effectively use technology (e.g.,
computers, high tech equipment)
+1.1 Draw conclusions after weighing evidence,
facts, and ideas
+1.0 Locate, screen, and organize information
+.9 Speak effectively
+.9 Understand and appreciate cultural and
ethnic differences
+.9 Problem solving skills
Overall undergraduate experience
Mean Frequency %
Low High
1
2
3
4
5
| 49. Your major at UIUC |
4.0 |
3 |
6 |
15 |
38 |
38 |
| 50. Your overall
educational experience at UIUC |
4.0 |
1 |
4 |
17 |
49 |
28 |
| 51. Your TOTAL
experience at UIUC |
4.2 |
1 |
3 |
15 |
40 |
42 |
| 52. If you could start
all over again, would you: |
| - attend UIUC again? |
84% |
| - attend another
institution? |
16% |
| - not attend college? |
0% |
| - take same major? |
62% |
All of the overall experience items received
high satisfaction ratings in this section. There were some variations in the
overall quality ratings by ethnic background, as shown in the graphs below.
Asian-American and African-American respondents gave slightly lower overall
ratings than did other students.
49. Please rate your major at UIUC:

50. Your overall educational experience at
UIUC:

51. Your TOTAL experience at UIUC:

52. If you could start all over again, would
you ...
attend UIUC again? (percent indicating yes):

Aspects of the University that were most
helpful to your pursuit of an education at UIUC
Of the 1,683 graduating seniors responding to
the Senior Survey, 1,067 (64%) responded to this item. A summary of their
responses is provided below. (One percent represents approximately 11 students.)
| Comment |
% of responses |
| Access to technology |
17 |
| Variety of course offerings |
13 |
| Excellence of faculty |
13 |
| Helpfulness of faculty/staff |
13 |
| Excellence of
college/department/program |
11 |
| Facilities/Resources |
11 |
| Extracurricular
activities/organizations |
9 |
| Peers/Other students |
7 |
| Libraries |
6 |
| Vast amount of opportunities |
6 |
| Cultural diversity |
5 |
| Diversity |
5 |
| Size of campus |
4 |
| Advisors |
4 |
| Cost |
4 |
| Reputation of UIUC |
3 |
| Learning environment |
3 |
| Undergraduate research |
2 |
| Study abroad |
2 |
| Greek system |
2 |
| Competition |
2 |
| Career/College placement office |
2 |
| Smaller classes at upper levels |
1 |
Aspects of the university that were obstacles
to your pursuit of an education at UIUC
Of the 1,683 graduating seniors responding to
the Senior Survey, 994 (59%) responded to this item. A summary of their
responses is provided below. (One percent represents approximately 10 students.)
| Comment |
% of responses |
| Poor or non-existent academic
advising |
16 |
| Poor teaching by professors |
16 |
| University too large/ "felt
like a number" |
12 |
| Classes too large |
9 |
| Too much bureaucracy/red tape |
9 |
| Professors not caring/helpful |
7 |
| Program requirements (courses,
GPA, hours) |
7 |
| Difficulty in getting desired
courses |
6 |
| Lack of adequate facilities |
6 |
| Poor teaching by TA’s |
4 |
| Sexual discrimination/Race
issues |
4 |
| Poor curriculum/program |
4 |
| Unavailability of professors |
3 |
| Non-relevant classes |
3 |
| Couldn’t understand foreign
TA’s |
2 |
| Emphasis on research at the
expense of teaching |
2 |
| Unfair/poor grading |
2 |
| Debate over the chief |
2 |
| Peers |
2 |
How has the university changed since your
freshman year?
Of the 1,683 graduating seniors responding to
the Senior Survey, 981 (58%) responded to this item. A summary of their
responses is provided below. (One percent represents approximately 10 students.)
| Comment |
% of responses |
| More emphasis on technology |
21 |
| Facilities/physical plant |
21 |
| Chief concerns increased |
7 |
| Racism increased |
3 |
| Campus is safer |
3 |
| University is more commercial |
3 |
| University is more expensive |
3 |
| Better alcohol management |
2 |
| More ethnic diversity |
2 |
| Sports (some better, some
worse) |
2 |
| University seems smaller |
2 |
| Campus more focused on race
relations |
2 |
| Better educational
opportunities |
1 |
| More crime and violence |
1 |
| Campus is friendlier |
1 |
| University is more liberal |
1 |
COMPARISON TO PREVIOUS YEAR - Demographics of
Respondents
This section of the report will compare 1998
Senior Survey results to responses recorded in 1990, 1993, 1996, and 1997. The
40% response rate in 1998 was highest ever for the survey. This year there were
slightly fewer African-American and Latino/Hispanic respondents and slightly
more Asian-American respondents than in past years. Following are some
additional differences among respondents over time.
Satisfaction with broad aspects of the
undergraduate experience
Following is a listing of item mean scores for
common items administered in 1990, 1993, 1996, 1997, and 1998. Overall, there is
consistency of student responses over time. However, the upward trend for many
of the items in 1996 and 1997 continued in the 1998 data. No single item mean
score was lower in 1998 than in 1997 and 18 were higher. Items with increases
are marked with a (+) and items with decreases are marked with a (-). Four item
means increased by +.2 of a point and three means increased by +.3. These seven
items are printed in bold typeface.
| 1998 |
1997 |
1996 |
1993 |
1990 |
| 3.9 |
3.9 |
3.8 |
3.9 |
3.8 |
1. Quality of teaching by faculty
in your major |
| 3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
2. Quality of teaching by faculty
outside your major |
| 3.3+ |
3.2 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
3. Quality of teaching by TAs |
| 3.5+ |
3.4 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
4. Quality of laboratories and
classrooms |
| 3.0 |
3.0 |
- |
- |
- |
5. Quality of academic program
advising and information |
| 3.0 |
3.0 |
- |
- |
- |
6. Quality of career advising and
information |
| 4.0 |
4.0 |
4.1 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
7. Access to course and course
sections in major |
| 3.5 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
3.3 |
3.5 |
8. Access to elective courses and
course sections |
| 3.1 |
3.1 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.2 |
9. Process of student evaluation
of teaching |
| 3.1 |
3.1 |
3.0 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
10. Class size at the 100 and 200
course level |
| 4.1 |
4.1 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
3.9 |
11. Class size at the 300 course
level |
| 3.8 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
3.7 |
12. Overall educational philosophy
of major |
| 3.7 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
13. Fairness of student
performance evaluation procedures |
| 3.3 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
3.1 |
3.1 |
14. Usefulness of evaluation
procedures to learning |
| 3.7+ |
3.5 |
3.5 |
- |
- |
15. Quantity of faculty
office hours |
| 4.0+ |
3.9 |
3.9 |
- |
- |
16. Faculty members’ presence
during posted office hours |
| 3.8+ |
3.7 |
3.6 |
- |
- |
17. Accessibility of faculty in
general |
| 3.4 |
3.4 |
- |
- |
- |
18. Communication between faculty
and students regarding student needs and concerns |
| 3.7 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
3.8 |
19. Easy to meet and get to know
other students |
| 4.0+ |
3.9 |
3.8 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
20. Easy to get involved in
student groups, activities |
| 3.9+ |
3.8 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
3.5 |
21. Exposure to different
backgrounds and cultures |
| 4.1+ |
3.9 |
3.9 |
3.7 |
4.0 |
22a. Classroom
environment free from racist behavior |
| 3.9+ |
3.7 |
3.8 |
3.6 |
3.8 |
22b. Classroom
environment free from sexist behavior |
| 3.0+ |
2.9 |
2.8 |
2.5 |
2.9 |
23a. Campus environment
free from racism |
| 3.4+ |
3.2 |
3.3 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
23b. Campus
environment free from sexism |
| 3.3+ |
3.2 |
3.1 |
3.0 |
3.2 |
24a. University appropriately
addressed racism |
| 3.5+ |
3.4 |
3.4 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
24b. University appropriately
addressed sexism |
| 4.1+ |
3.8 |
3.8 |
3.7 |
3.8 |
25. Felt that you were welcome
at UIUC |
| 3.4+ |
3.2 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
3.1 |
26. Had someone you could go to
for help |
| 2.6+ |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.3 |
2.3 |
27. "University" cared about you |
| 3.6+ |
3.3 |
3.1 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
28. You felt safe on campus |
| 4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.1 |
3.9 |
49. Please rate your major at UIUC |
| 4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
3.9 |
50. Your overall educational
experience at UIUC |
| 4.2+ |
4.1 |
4.0 |
3.9 |
3.8 |
51. Your TOTAL experience at UIUC |
Student Ratings of Entering and Exiting
Abilities
The students’ ratings of their exiting abilities
are significantly higher than their entering ratings in all three years the
items were used. The average rating increase across abilities was +.8 in 1998,
which is higher than the average of +.7 in the two previous years. Three
abilities (printed in bold typeface) reported entering/exiting gains of at least
one rating point.
|
1998 |
|
|
|
1997 |
|
|
|
1996 |
|
|
Entering |
Exiting |
|
|
Entering |
Exiting |
|
|
Entering |
Exiting |
|
|
|
Rating |
Rating |
Diff |
|
Rating |
Rating |
Diff |
|
Rating |
Rating |
Diff |
Ability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
4.2 |
.8 |
|
3.5 |
4.1 |
.6 |
|
3.5 |
4.1 |
.6 |
Write effectively |
3.2 |
4.1 |
.9 |
|
3.2 |
4.0 |
.8 |
|
3.2 |
4.0 |
.8 |
Speak effectively |
3.4 |
4.2 |
.8 |
|
3.4 |
4.0 |
.6 |
|
3.5 |
4.0 |
.5 |
Create original ideas |
3.4 |
4.5 |
1.1 |
|
3.5 |
4.3 |
.8 |
|
3.6 |
4.3 |
.7 |
Draw conclusions |
3.4 |
4.4 |
1.0 |
|
3.5 |
4.3 |
.8 |
|
3.5 |
4.3 |
.8 |
Locate/organize info |
3.3 |
4.2 |
.9 |
|
3.3 |
4.1 |
.8 |
|
3.2 |
4.0 |
.8 |
Appreciate differences |
3.5 |
4.4 |
.9 |
|
3.6 |
4.3 |
.7 |
|
- |
- |
- |
Problem solving skills |
3.6 |
4.2 |
.6 |
|
3.6 |
4.2 |
.6 |
|
3.5 |
4.1 |
.6 |
Get along with others |
3.5 |
4.0 |
.5 |
|
3.4 |
4.0 |
.6 |
|
3.4 |
3.9 |
.5 |
Appreciate fine arts |
2.8 |
4.4 |
1.6 |
|
2.7 |
4.2 |
1.5 |
|
2.8 |
4.2 |
1.4 |
Use technology |
2.7 |
2.7 |
0 |
|
2.5 |
2.7 |
.2 |
|
2.6 |
2.6 |
0 |
Use another language |
3.1 |
3.8 |
.7 |
|
3.1 |
3.7 |
.6 |
|
3.2 |
3.8 |
.6 |
Understand science |
3.3 |
3.7 |
.4 |
|
3.3 |
3.7 |
.4 |
|
3.3 |
3.7 |
.4 |
Understand math |
3.8 |
4.2 |
.4 |
|
3.8 |
4.3 |
.5 |
|
- |
- |
- |
Understand values/ethics |
3.6 |
4.3 |
.7 |
|
3.6 |
4.3 |
.7 |
|
3.6 |
4.3 |
.7 |
Work in groups |
3.7 |
4.5 |
.8 |
|
3.7 |
4.5 |
.8 |
|
3.8 |
4.5 |
.7 |
Learn on own |
3.3 |
4.1 |
.8 |
|
3.3 |
4.2 |
.9 |
|
3.4 |
4.2 |
.8 |
Organize time effectively |
- |
3.8 |
- |
|
- |
4.2 |
- |
|
- |
4.3 |
- |
Demonstrate competency |
- |
4.1 |
- |
|
- |
4.0 |
- |
|
- |
4.0 |
- |
Seek/obtain employment |
- |
4.2 |
- |
|
- |
4.2 |
- |
|
- |
- |
- |
Understand context |
Satisfaction with the campus environment
The tables below show response pattern changes
for respondents with different ethnic backgrounds to several questions regarding
racism on campus and in the classroom. The most noticeable differences from past
years were the slightly higher ratings given by Caucasian, Hispanic/Latino, and
Asian-American respondents, and the slightly lower ratings given by the
African-Americans respondents.
22a. The classroom environment was
free from racist behavior:
| |
1998 |
1997 |
1996 |
1993 |
1990 |
| Caucasian |
4.2 |
4.0 |
3.9 |
3.8 |
4.0 |
| Asian-American |
3.8 |
3.6 |
3.8 |
3.5 |
3.8 |
| African-American |
2.9 |
3.1 |
1.8 |
2.4 |
2.6 |
| Hispanic/Latino |
3.6 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
3.2 |
3.7 |
| Native American |
- |
4.0 |
3.0 |
- |
- |
23a. The campus environment was free
from racism
| |
1998 |
1997 |
1996 |
1993 |
1990 |
| Caucasian |
3.1 |
3.0 |
2.8 |
2.6 |
2.9 |
| Asian-American |
2.9 |
2. 6 |
2. 8 |
2.3 |
2.7 |
| African-American |
2.1 |
2.3 |
1.5 |
1.6 |
2.0 |
| Hispanic/Latino |
2.6 |
2.3 |
2.6 |
2.0 |
2.6 |
| Native American |
- |
2.3 |
3.0 |
- |
- |
24a. The University appropriately addressed
problems of racism:
| |
1998 |
1997 |
1996 |
1993 |
1990 |
| Caucasian |
3.4 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
3.1 |
3.3 |
| Asian-American |
3.1 |
2.9 |
3.0 |
2.8 |
2.9 |
| African-American |
2.3 |
2.4 |
1.8 |
1.8 |
2.5 |
| Hispanic/Latino |
2.8 |
2.6 |
2.8 |
2.3 |
3.2 |
| Native American |
- |
2.3 |
1.5 |
- |
- |
Men and women students continue to differ in
their responses to the questions regarding sexism and sexist behavior on campus
and in the classroom. Women respondents are less satisfied than men respondents.
Both groups reported slightly higher ratings in 1998 than in the past.
22b. The classroom environment was
free from sexist behavior:
|